THREATS FROM SCARBOROUGH COUNCIL to Nigel Ward,democracy removed

Corruption Busters
SCARBOROUGH BOROUGH COUNCIL have threatened legal action (civil and criminal) against me, against Real Whitby, and against the Corruption Busters. This threat seeks to silence criticism of corrupt elected members and paid public servants, to curtail the freedom of the press and to squander the public purse on a futile attem to cover up all manner of wrong-doing. It is also the single worst example of an incompetent solicitor’s letter that I have ever seen in my life. It will also back-fire into the worst PR disaster by any Council in the country. Please Share as widely as possible to help achieve that.

Head of Service: Lisa Dixon DX: 719232 SCARBOROUGH 5
Scarborough Borough Council
28 March 2013

Dear Nigel,

l am a solicitor and Head of Legal and Democratic Services at Scarborough Borough Council.

It has come to the Counci|’s attention that articles published on the abovementioned website contain defamatory and untrue comments which are harmful to Scarborough Borough Council, its Officers and Members and which have or will hinder the ability of the Council to discharge a number of its functions.

Upon inspection of the website it is noted that you are one of the authors of the offending material. It is noted that you hold yourself out to be an “investigative journalist”. This being the case, you are under the same obligations as the rest of the media to ensure that:

1. the sources of your information are verified;

2. comment is sought from those being criticised before the article is published; and

3. the article is fair, balanced and even-handed

You (and others) have consistently failed to take the steps outlined above. As a result, the website contains malicious, untrue and defamatory material in relation to which the subjects of the statements made have been denied the right to comment until after publication, if at all.

Scarborough Borough Council considers that the publication of some of the articles and comments currently on the website is likely to constitute criminal activity.

At the very least, Scarborough Borough Council is satisfied that many of the articles and comments published amount to actionable breaches of civil law.

It is Scarborough Borough CounciI’s position that many of the articles authored by yourself contain statements that are highly defamatory of officers and councillors and which seek to damage the reputation of the Council itself and amount to actionable instances of defamation for which the Council, or individuals would be entitled to bring legal proceedings against you.

Should legal proceedings be initiated against you in respect of defamation then it is unlikely that you would be able to defend any claim on the basis of justification, honest comment or qualified privilege due to your failure to verify information, seek comment or present a balanced story.

Scarborough Borough Council expect that you are able to evidence the truthfulness of any articles or comments that you write and Scarborough Borough Council may chose to test your ability to evidence such truthfulness by initiating proceedings at court if it is felt that you have failed to comply with the terms of this letter.

Should you continue to publish untrue and defamatory statements (whether on the website referred to above or elsewhere) then it is likely that Scarborough Borough Council will initiate legal proceedings against you. If this is the case then this letter would be put before the court to demonstrate that you are aware of your obligations, as detailed above.

Should it be necessary to initiate court proceedings against you then Scarborough Borough Council will ask the court to order that you pay the Councils legal costs incurred in pursuing any such action. This could amount to a considerable sum.

I trust that you will comply with the contents of this letter and that it will not be necessary for Scarborough Borough Council to bring legal proceedings against you.

You may wish to take independent legal advice on the contents of this letter.

Yours sincerely

Lisa Dixon, Solicitor

Head of Legal and Democratic Services

Scarborough Borough Council

Nigel Ward
Superb summary from Richard Ineson – see comments:

Sue me


Published by: No cctv. Detective held blood.

I've been convicted of a crime I DID Not do, With one conviction in 45 years,for burglary,After 23Attempts Failed to Convict me of Any Crime the Police in. #Teesside. Falsified the forensics Evidence against me and others,the detective Wrote how he Held the Forensics blood Evidence used in court to Convict me which is illegal. I Now Have Evidence of statements of Fact that the Cleveland police Detective DC1309 Did commit fruad by having the Blood Evidence at the police station when it was not supposed to be there,that he sent the only evidence of blood to forensics,which was linked to me by forensics,this is detrimental to the officer who admitted he sent,had hold of it,the only bloood sample linked to me,Against the Continuity of forensics whole Case,against me,the worst of it is 6 judges received it,CPS declared the written evidence in court,bmy defence seeen it,and did nothing about it,when I did telll them that my blood was Never found at any crime at all,all 16 witnesses for the prosecution. Did receive this evidence and desperately tried to cover this crime up,against all Laws in order to protect criminal eliments of the cleveland police,even my Own barrister keiran Rainey of fountain Solicitors was involved. VOTE FOR ME as mayor of Middlesbrough I have less on My CRB disclosure than the Mayor of Middlersbrough Convicted on blood that WAS falsified by tow detectives at cleveland police force I still have LESS convictions than Ray Mallon Mayor Of Middlesbrough and Chief Sean Price of Cleveland Police farce, The Two detectives have now implicated 16witnesses,for the prosecutions own evidence, The CPS The 5 judges used for over 15 court appearances Forensics who received the falsified blood IPCC who received up till now all the evidence of this Crime It is interference with the course of justice It is perjury Interference with witnesses In the Cleveland police efforts to Arrest me 23 times and convict me knowing of dc Crawfords admitted guilt,they salndered me publically as a delusional,paranoid,psychosis,Psychotic whistleblower,and failed in 22 of those arrests,all the arrests unconvited went on my CRB disclosures for ten years effecting directly my bus licence to drive,removed in 2008 in 2009 the burglary allegation was made against me,in 2011 the guilty verdict came from a jury,after ten minutes,they took away my bus licence until 2013,then after an altercation with DVLA Ithis Psychotic bus driver got his Bus licence back,as No evidence of being psychotic or any other words used by this corrupt authourity was found on any medical records as it shows a mass conspiracy to defruad,the justice system,using 16 witnesses,6 Top QC judges,CPS,doctors,Psychologists,and I can prove every bit of it,, Bigger than hackgate or the Leveson enquiry. No cctv. Detective held blood.

Categories UncategorizedTagsLeave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s