Falsified Forensics by DC1309 Alastair Crawford. ClevelandPolice. UK.
Neil scott made 42 freedom of information requests but was suspended this included requests for information on Why scotland Yard didn’t know of the 23 false arrrests neil Scott went through and Why police didn’t report them to the national computers at Scotland Yard.
They were hiding the crimes they won’t pay out for now along with falsified Forensics evidence available to review now.
28 August 2014 at 1:30pm
Police to review how they record crime in North East
Cleveland and North Yorkshire Police have been told to review the way they record crime data following criticism in a recent Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) report.
The inspection was carried out on crimes recorded between November 2012 and October 2013.
It raised concerns over the recording of serious crimes, including rapes, by both forces.
The main concerns raised about Cleveland Police surrounded accuracy of crime recording.
The HMIC inspection of Cleveland Police said the “high error rate” within the force is “a matter of serious concern” and that the force in the North East needs to put more detail into explaining the reasons for their decisions.
Immediately the force should ensure the prompt recording of crimes in compliance with the National Crime Recording Standard (NCRS) and Home Office Counting Rules (HOCR).
Particular attention must be paid to the correct recording of sexual offences and the work of the protecting vulnerable people unit.
No-crime refers to an incident that was initially recorded as a crime but has subsequently been found not to be a crime on the basis of additional verifiable information. We reviewed 84 no-crime records and found 46 records to be compliant with HOCR and NCRS. As the no-crime records we reviewed were for offences for rape, robbery and violence this high error rate is a matter of serious concern.
– HMIC INSPECTION OF CLEVELAND POLICE
North Yorkshire Police has also been reviewed by the inspection programme, which is approved by the Home Secretary under section 54 of the Police Act 1996.
All 43 police forces in England and Wales are coming under scrutiny but Cleveland and North Yorkshire are the only North East forces examined in the latest batch of results.
The first batch took place in May 2014 and there will be a further batch of force-specific reports in Autumn 2014.
The main concerns raised about North Yorkshire Police by the inspection also surrounded accuracy of crime recording, particularly rape ‘no-crime’ records.
In a summary of their inspection into the North Yorkshire Police, the HMIC have said the force should review the way in which they record crime data “immediately” and that the force’s rape ‘no-crime’ records are “particularly concerning”.
Immediately, the force should carry out a comprehensive assessment of crime recording standards.
We examined 72 incident records and found that 68 crimes should have been recorded. Of the 68 crimes that should have been recorded, 57 were. Of the 57, five were wrongly classified and 13 were recorded outside the 72-hour limit allowed under the HOCR. There is a need for improvement in the accuracy and timeliness of crime recording decisions.
No crime refers to an incident that was initially recorded as a crime but has subsequently been found not to be a crime on the basis of additional verifiable information. Of the 105 no-crimes we reviewed, 71 complied with the NCRS and HOCR.
It is particularly concerning that of the 35 rape no-crime records we reviewed, 21 of them were incorrectly no-crimed.
– HMIC INSPECTION OF NORTH YORKSHIRE POLICE
Last updated Thu 28 Aug 2014.
I did tell you.